Thoughts on political endorcements

By Joshua Kagi January 31st, 2008 Email this post Post a comment

I’ve got a few thoughts on some recent endorsements of Barack Obama for President.

First of all, I’m not sure how effective an endorsement by a well known person is to your average everyday voter. I’m much more likely to listen to the words of like-minded family, friends, or co-workers over a Senator or Governor from my state, let alone another state.

If I was part of a union, which I’m not, I wouldn’t give a damn who they chose to endorse. Does anyone really think that the Culinary Union of Nevada, despite an endorsement of Obama really voted as a block for Obama? I doubt it.

That’s not to say I don’t take some people’s opinions into consideration, especially when they make their thoughts known in a clear and persuasive way. But, those people are few and far between, and have earned my trust not because of their power or influence on politics, but rather by their influence in my life personally.

In fact, the recent endorsements of Obama by both Massachusetts Senators, John Kerry and Teddy Kennedy made me grimace, not rejoice. Both men are polarizing figures, something Obama doesn’t represent.

However, as a political junkie, I do find these endorsements interesting, especially the reactions to them.

While I wasn’t overly joyful of Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Obama, another Kennedy’s words caught my attention.

Caroline Kennedy in her New York Times op-ed endorsing Obama says,

My reasons are patriotic, political and personal, and the three are intertwined. All my life, people have told me that my father changed their lives, that they got involved in public service or politics because he asked them to. And the generation he inspired has passed that spirit on to its children. I meet young people who were born long after John F. Kennedy was president, yet who ask me how to live out his ideals…

…I have spent the past five years working in the New York City public schools and have three teenage children of my own. There is a generation coming of age that is hopeful, hard-working, innovative and imaginative. But too many of them are also hopeless, defeated and disengaged. As parents, we have a responsibility to help our children to believe in themselves and in their power to shape their future. Senator Obama is inspiring my children, my parents’ grandchildren, with that sense of possibility…

…I have never had a president who inspired me the way people tell me that my father inspired them. But for the first time, I believe I have found the man who could be that president — not just for me, but for a new generation of Americans.

Caroline’s words are the reason why we’re seeing such overwhelming majorities of young voters migrating to Obama, myself included.

We were born in a post Kennedy (J.F.K. and Robert), post Martin Luther King Jr., post Watergate scandal, America. We’ve never known a uniting political figure. We’ve only known polarizing and corrupt politics. For our parents and grandparents generations, they once had hope in political figures. Vietnam started it, but Watergate changed that forever. Obama is our J.F.K., our Robert Kennedy, our MLK. He is our generations first uniting figure. (For this reason I fear for Obama’s life, but that’s another topic for another day).

Another issue brought up by the recent endorsements was a reaction by a particular focus group to the Kennedy family getting behind Obama.

On Tuesday, CNN reported that,

Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy is under heavy fire from a state chapter of the National Organization for Women for his decision to back Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.In a sharply critical statement, the New York state chapter of NOW took aim at Kennedy Monday for what it called an “ultimate betrayal,” and suggested the Massachusetts Democrat “can’t or won’t” handle the idea of Clinton becoming President of the United States…

…”And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment!” the statement continues. “He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton.”

To me, NOW is expressing exactly what is wrong with politics today. First, is it even remotely possible that someone could consider Obama a better candidate than Clinton? Yes, okay next point. Second, is it at all possible that the Senator is indeed NOT sexist, nor “can’t handle the prospect of a woman president,” but rather just thinks Obama would do a better job? Yeah, okay moving on. Third, “He’s picked the new guy over us.” Really? Really?! Do we even need to counter act this point? I thought not.

Finally, one person who’s opinion I do trust wrote on why he was voting for Obama. See Tony Jones post, who has a similar voting record to myself, some republicans, some independents (or third-party candidates), and some democrats.

Money-quote,

But I am supporting Barack Obama for president. Why? Because Obama has so many of the qualities that we need in a president. He is committed to uniting the country around a vision for the future, he is committed to foreign diplomacy rather than empty posturing, he plays politics by a different and more noble playbook.

Listening to: The album “Girls and Boys” by Ingrid Michaelson


This post is tagged

13 Comments

  1. Josh, in the big picture I think this does say plenty. To me it’s the establishment, backing, not the established candidate but the newcomer.
    Does that make sense.

  2. Rick, I’m not entirely sure what your mean in your comment? Are you saying that you’re concerned that the Democratic establishment, (read, the Kennedy’s, et al) are backing Obama instead of the entrenched candidate in Hillary Clinton?

  3. Personally, I don’t care who backs who when it comes to my own personal vote - I read, I listen, I read some more, and I make a decision.

    As far as perhaps the Kennedy / Kerry endorsement “entrenching” our guy….I trust Obama. I don’t think we need to worry about that.

    Just my opinion - I could be wrong.

  4. PS - I LOVED Caroline Kennedy’s piece.

  5. Rick and Barb, we need to get you guys both gravatars. You comment here often enough, and other blogs have the feature as well. (Epinoia will soon too). A gravatar is the photo you see under each commenter’s name. Just click on the blue icon, and it’ll take you to the site with the info.

  6. I’ll see what I can do.

  7. Okay, now how do I make it appear?

  8. Now it’ll appear on any site that has the gravatar feature, and that you use the same email address for.

  9. I don’t seem to be seeing it.

  10. Josh,

    Obviously, I’ve mentioned here before that I have more conservative propencities; however, this year’s election may change that.

    Hillary Clinton is too divisive for me, but I would be more than comfortable with Barck Obama in the White House. On the Republican side, I hope that John McCain comes out on top, because he has a pretty good record of working with democrats on a myriad of issues. I think Romney would be more partisan.

    So, if it comes down to McCain and Obama, I will have a difficult time choosing. I know more about McCain because of his bid for the White House in 2000, but Obama is very engaging and charasmatic. He definitely has a unifying spirit about him. This will be a tough election for me.

    It’s funny, because I sure wouldn’t say this to some of my Christian friends who are pretty far to the right. Unfortunately, there are many Christians out there who believe that only conservative values are Christian. I say that’s pretty naive! I’m sorry, but when Jesus returns he isn’t going to ask me what allegiance I had to a ceratin political party.

    Besides, I tend to be more middle-of-the-road. The far-right and the far-left have a lot in common: low approval ratings in Congress!

  11. Jason, when I turned 18 and first registered to vote, I registered as a Republican. I actually worked for a member of the Democratic house leadership in Salem as a Republican. But working in that environment in Salem, coupled with the national trends, I found myself falling farther and farther away from the Republican agenda. In fact, one woman who worked in the office with me was originally from Tennessee, she always told me if I lived in the South, I would have been a democrat. I think she’s right. Anyway, since then I’ve re-registered as an independent. I’m frankly sick of both parties telling their members how to vote and if you differ from it you’re a bad legislator.

    As far as this years presidential politics, it’s obvious that I’m all about Obama, I have been since before he declared his candidacy. I was a fan of McCain in 2000, but that was before I could vote. I think the 2008 version of McCain is quite different than the 2000 version, and I’d have a very hard time getting behind him now. That’s not to say I wouldn’t give him a shot to sway me in a Clinton/McCain general election, but it’d be highly unlikely, though I agree Clinton is a divisive figure.

    For me personally, the dream match-up from the beginning was Obama vs. Huckabee, but now Huckabee is just an afterthought who’s campaign will likely come to an end on Wednesday after the Super Tuesday votes have been tallied.

  12. Unrelated to any of this, I finally see my picture!! :-)

  13. Yes, you’re right. McCain is different now than in 2000. I think part of it is politcal posturing. He can’t be too independent, or he’ll lose part of the Republican base he needs to win the primary and the election. I’ve heard some reports of a McCain/Leiberman ticket. Not sure that would happen, but it would be interesting.

    As for the Democrats, I don’t think they have to worry as much. They can be more of themselves and truly preach what they believe. I say this because enough Republicans and Independents are fed up with Bush, and his policies, that they’d be willing to vote for a fresh change.

    Republicans are going to have a very hard time convincing voters to go with another conservative President. Personally, I think the Democrats will end up in the White House.

Leave a Reply